Update references to the missing_fragment_specifier lint
#376
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
traviscross
added
the
S-waiting-on-team
tgross35
changed the title
missing_fragment_specifier lintmissing_fragment_specifier lint
tgross35
force-pushed
the
unlink-missing-fragment-specifier
branch
2 times, most recently
from
821e93d to
eeb9d93
Compare
|
@traviscross from rust-lang/rust#128425 (comment) I've added a note mentioning the change after the edition. |
traviscross
approved these changes
May 20, 2025
This lint is planned to be removed in [1], but CI is failing due to linkcheck issues in the edition guide. Remove links and add a note that the lint has become an error in all editions. [1]: rust-lang/rust#128425
traviscross
force-pushed
the
unlink-missing-fragment-specifier
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f2b91ab to
cdf57fd
Compare
Now that this is a hard error in all editions, let's adjust the text a bit to make it clear what behavior is current and what is historical.
traviscross
force-pushed
the
unlink-missing-fragment-specifier
branch
from
cdf57fd to
67a1eff
Compare
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
Update books ## rust-lang/edition-guide 1 commits in 1b1bb49babd65c732468cfa515b0c009bd1d26bc..aa6ce337c0adf7a63e33960d184270f2a45ab9ef 2025-05-20 23:47:34 UTC to 2025-05-20 23:47:34 UTC - Update references to the `missing_fragment_specifier` lint (rust-lang/edition-guide#376) ## rust-lang/reference 3 commits in acd0231ebc74849f6a8907b5e646ce86721aad76..118fd1f1f0854f50e3ae1fe4b64862aad23009ca 2025-05-20 22:52:38 UTC to 2025-05-20 21:45:13 UTC - Explain why nested receivers are dyn-incompatible (rust-lang/reference#1822) - Enable `[canonicalize-issue-links]` and `[no-mentions]` in triagebot (rust-lang/reference#1788) - Mention the temporary scope of `while let`. (rust-lang/reference#1779)
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#141316 - rustbot:docs-update, r=ehuss Update books ## rust-lang/edition-guide 1 commits in 1b1bb49babd65c732468cfa515b0c009bd1d26bc..aa6ce337c0adf7a63e33960d184270f2a45ab9ef 2025-05-20 23:47:34 UTC to 2025-05-20 23:47:34 UTC - Update references to the `missing_fragment_specifier` lint (rust-lang/edition-guide#376) ## rust-lang/reference 3 commits in acd0231ebc74849f6a8907b5e646ce86721aad76..118fd1f1f0854f50e3ae1fe4b64862aad23009ca 2025-05-20 22:52:38 UTC to 2025-05-20 21:45:13 UTC - Explain why nested receivers are dyn-incompatible (rust-lang/reference#1822) - Enable `[canonicalize-issue-links]` and `[no-mentions]` in triagebot (rust-lang/reference#1788) - Mention the temporary scope of `while let`. (rust-lang/reference#1779)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This lint is planned to be removed in 1, but CI is failing due to linkcheck issues in the edition guide. Remove links and add a note that the lint has become an error in all editions.